Thu 30 Jul 2009
Suite Francaise by Irene Nemirovsky
Posted by Emma under books
[6] Comments

Synopsis:
From The Washington Post
This extraordinary work of fiction about the German occupation of France is embedded in a real story as gripping and complex as the invented one. Composed in 1941-42 by an accomplished writer who had published several well-received novels, Suite Française, her last work, was written under the tremendous pressure of a constant danger that was to catch up with her and kill her before she had finished.
Irène Némirovsky was a Jewish, Russian immigrant from a wealthy family who had fled the Bolsheviks as a teenager. She spent her adult life in France, wrote in French but preserved the detachment and cool distance of the outsider. She and her husband were deported to Auschwitz in 1942, where he was gassed upon arrival and she died in the infirmary at the age of 39. Her manuscript, in minuscule and barely readable handwriting, was preserved by her daughters, who, ignorant of the fact that these notebooks contained a full-fledged masterpiece, left it unread until 60 years later. Once published, with an appendix that illuminates the circumstances of its origin and the author’s plan for its completion, it quickly became a bestseller in France. It is hard to imagine a reader who will not be wholly engrossed and moved by this book.
Némirovsky’s plan consisted of five parts. She completed only the first two before she was murdered. Yet they are not fragmentary; they read like polished novellas. The first, “Storm in June,” gives us a cross section of the population during the initial exodus from the capital, when a battle for Paris was expected and people fled helter-skelter south, so that the roads were clogged with refugees of all classes. Némirovsky shows how much caste and money continued to matter, how the nation was not united in the face of danger and a common enemy. In her account, the well-to-do continue to be especially egotistical and petty. And yet a deep, unsentimental sympathy pervades this panorama. Looking up to the sky at enemy planes overhead, the refugees who have to sleep on the street or in their cars “lacked both courage and hope. This was how animals waited to die. It was the way fish caught in a net watch the shadow of the fisherman moving back and forth above them.” I can’t think of a more chilling and concise image to convey the helplessness of civilians in an air raid.
Not being French herself but steeped in French culture may have made it easier for Némirovsky to achieve her penetrating insights with Flaubertian objectivity. She gives us startling, steely etched sketches of both collaboration and resistance among people motivated by personal loyalties and grievances that date from before the war.
The second part, “Dolce” (the title — Italian for “sweet” — derives from Némirovsky’s plan to give the work a musical structure), covers the occupation by the Germans of a small village, from the so-called armistice in June 1940 to the Soviet Union’s entry into the war a year later. One can forget that there was a period after the defeat of France when World War II could be seen simply as a war between Germany and Britain. The villagers yearn for peace, and many are indifferent as to who wins, England or Germany, as long as their own men come home. Némirovsky is superb in describing how fraternization comes about, including French girls and women giving in to the attractions of the handsome German occupants — there are no other men around, most of the French men having been taken prisoner. But the unnatural situation also breeds fierce feelings of resentment and humiliation. Némirovsky embodies this conflict in the story of a woman who falls in love with a German officer and at the same time hides a villager wanted for the murder of another German — a murder motivated partly by patriotic hatred and partly by marital jealousy.
One puzzling omission from the spectrum of conquered and cowering French society is the Jews — the one group that was more endangered than any other, as Némirovsky knew only too well. Perhaps she wanted to save the fate of the Jews for the next part, which was to be entitled “Captivity.” Even so, when one thinks of the threat the Jewish population endured even at this early stage of persecution, one feels the significant gap here.
Still, this is an incomparable book, in some ways sui generis. While diaries give us a day-to-day record, their very inclusiveness can lead to tedium; memoirs, on the other hand, written at a later date, search for highlights and illuminate the past from the vantage point of the present. In Némirovsky’s Suite Française we have the perfect mixture: a gifted novelist’s account of a foreign occupation, written while it was taking place, with history and imagination jointly evoking a bitter time, correcting and enriching our memory.
Reviewed by Ruth Kluger
Copyright 2006, The Washington Post. All Rights Reserved.
Review
It was a wonderful read. It wasn’t a novel really. It was more like a novella with short vignettes about the time of German Occupation of France in WWII. There were many different characters and different points of view about what the French experienced during the War. She chose different characters from different classes. There were the aristocrats, the bourgeoisie,
the farmers, the lower working class, the influential writers. Each chapter revolved around a different class of people and how they endured the War. You can still see that a caste system is still in place. The wealthy were hardly affected by the war as much as the poor people. Their views on the war were different. The wealthy knew that they could come out of it alive and still retain their station in life. The poor however were struggling to survive and flee their villages. They didn’t have money to bribe people in other villages for food and petrol (if they had a car, which most didn’t.) The poor also had many of their husbands in the war, most taken as prisoners by the Germans. The wealthy were far removed from that. Irene had a wonderful way of weaving her vignettes. Her metaphors and descriptions were amazing. She’s a very good writer. It’s an unfinished novel, since it was being written before she was killed in Auschwitz. She was Jewish and despite her fame, she was executed. So was her husband. Her two daughters were able to survive by hiding from the Germans and changing their names. The most interesting stories were about how the Germans were billeted to certain villages and lived with the French. Every French household had to take in a soldier. It was interesting to see how polite and somewhat kind the Germans were to the French. Well probably not to the Jews. But Irene doesn’t write about them. She didn’t have a chance to finish the book. But the Germans were rather friendly with the French. Although they made it clear that they were the conquerors. There are references to WWI when the French conquered Germany. But it didn’t seem like the Germans were trying to exact revenge. They were polite and civilized and treated the French decently. The wealthy French were treated even better. There wasn’t this feeling that all the French were in this war together. There were definitely class boundaries and divisiveness. It was interesting to note that the French and Germans managed to get along with each other despite the fact that this was wartime and the Germans were the enemy. Some French refused to deal with the Germans unless they had to. But for the most part the French were curious about the Germans and fraternized with them.
I thought it was a very well-written book. I wish Irene wasn’t murdered so that she could have finished the book. It would have been interesting to see the part about how the Jews were treated. If you’re interested in French History during the time of German Occupation of France during WWII, then I highly recommend this book. I give this book 4 out of 5 stars. I didn’t give it five because it’s an unfinished book. But still, it was rather good and illuminating. It gave you a bird’s eye view of what actually transpired during that time. At the end of the book is an Appendix that shows Irene’s notes for the novel as well as correspondence to her Publishers and correspondence from her husband looking for Irene when she was taken as a Jewish prisoner and sent to be executed.
Sphere: Related Contentpermalink
trackback
Tags: book review, books, France, irene nemirovsky, suite francaise, WWII

I recently saw your post about reading Irène Némirovsky’s Suite Française. I wanted to pass along some information about an exciting exhibition closing August 30 about Némirovsky’s life, work, and legacy. I urge you to see Woman of Letters: Irène Némirovsky and Suite Française, at the Museum of Jewish Heritage —A Living Memorial to the Holocaust in New York City. The exhibition includes powerful rare artifacts —including the valise in which the original manuscript for Suite Française was found, as well as many personal papers and family photos. The majority of these documents and artifacts have never been outside of France. For fans of her work, this exhibition is an opportunity to really “get to know” Irene. Don’t miss this opportunity to learn more about this beloved writer! And for those who can’t visit, there is a special website devoted to her story http://www.mjhnyc.org/irene.
Although we are in the lazy days of summer, book clubs and groups are invited to the Museum for tours and discussions in the exhibition’s adjacent Salon (by appointment). It is the Museum’s hope that the exhibit will engage visitors and promote dialogue about this extraordinary writer and the complex time in which she lived and died. To book a group tour, please contact Chris Lopez at 646.437.4304 or clopez@mjhnyc.org. Please visit our website at http://www.mjhnyc.org for up-to-date information about upcoming public programs or to join our e-bulletin list.
Thanks for sharing this info with your readers. If you need any more, please do not hesitate to contact me at hfurst@mjhnyc.org
Thank you for the information and insight. I live in NYC so I can go visit the Museum of Jewish Heritage. I would love to see and learn more about Irène Némirovsky’s life. I think this is a golden opportunity. I don’t belong to a book club. I was thinking of just taking the tour with a friend and myself. Do I still have to book an appointment? Or can I just peruse the museum with just a friend?
Thank you for all the links, especially the link to Irène Némirovsky’s life story. I will definitely check that out.
I’ll call that number you left to see if I can still visit the museum without a book club or group.
Thank you for this vital and exciting information. I will definitely go visit the museum this coming month.
The lovers in the second novel question whether the needs of the individual or the community should take priority. Lucille imagines that “in five, or ten, or twenty years” this problem will have been replaced by others. To what extent, if at all, has this proved the case? Has Western society conclusively decided to privilege the individual over the group?
Well that book took place during WWII, more than 50 years ago. I’m not familiar with French history, past or modern, so I can’t tell if Western Society there places individual rights over a group. I think a caste like system still exists, but it’s eroded a great deal since then. I think since the French Revolution and then the subsequent World Wars, individual rights have started to take precedence more, despite there still existing a caste system. I still think they made some progress, but it hasn’t been completely eradicated.
In the United States we have a Capitalist class structure. Supposedly individual rights should take place over class groups, but we know from past history and current history that groups of people, like African-Americans and gays as groups fight for their rights.
I think in Western Society as the marginalized groups work harder and faster for their rights there will come a time that it will only be about individual rights instead of group rights. But as long as people are marginalized in Western Society, groupthink will be the norm.
Top post! I’ve been to visit the Museum of Jewish Heritage, and it’s both interesting as well as informative. You could even say that it’s a real eye-opener!! I too would like to find out more about Irène Némirovsky’s life… thanks :-)
You’re welcome. I plan to go to the museum next month before the exhibit is closed. I’ve never gone there before. It will probably be very educational and as you say “eye-opening.”